High quality and no plagiarism guarantee! Get professional essay writing help at an affordable cost. Rating ( 66 score) - 2 votes. It is not the end of the world. We understand the stress you are feeling, the sleepless nights and the ongoing worry. But you have taken the perfect first step: you are looking for legal help.
Impaired and Aggressive driving Essay - 307 Words - studyMode
People posses their own determination and will do what they want to do, and this willpower becomes even stronger when alcohol enters the picture. Judgment becomes impaired, and a persons decision making goes downhill. This fact alone contributes greatly to the fact that people will always drive drunk, no matter what anyone does. Although nothing can totally prevent drunk driving, certain steps such as the education of not only the potential driver, but his friends as well, can play a significant role. The increase in fines, however, would prove completely ineffective and have no impact whatsoever on the amount of drunk driving that takes place. People simply do not consider the legal punishment when making the decision to drive while intoxicated. Knowing that consequences can go so much further that an easy fine and even be as serious as death, however, may sway someones choice. The prevention of drunk driving does not lie in legislation, but in education. Educated people make educated decisions, and educated people will not make the decision to drive drunk. You can order a custom essay, term paper, research paper, thesis or dissertation. Drunk Driving topics at seating our professional custom essay writing service which provides students with custom papers written by highly qualified academic writers.
A person needs to possess enough common sense to not let someone who is obviously intoxicated sit behind the wheel. While a possible fine will not stop someone from driving drunk, a close friend telling them not to drive will prevent them from doing. In order to stop an intent person who has decided that he wants to drive drunk, a friend must also prove intent in stopping them. The saying, Friends dont let friends drive drunk, could not have any more accuracy. Many times, a person will use every excuse in the world to convince someone to let them drive. A true friend should never let someone drive drunk, no matter the circumstances. The fact remains true, that no matter what anyone does, whether increasing the punishment, or educating the public, we cannot completely solve the problem of drunk driving. Preaching to me about the evils of drinking didnt stop me though. This"tion from An Indian Story, by with roger Jack, demonstrates the average persons attitude towards alcohol.
An individual needs to know facts such as how many drinks it takes to push them above the legal blood alcohol limit to drive. The legal blood alcohol content in Kentucky stands.08. This means that if an officer stops a driver whos blood alcohol content proves above.08, the officer recognizes this person as impaired, and can proceed with giving them a dui. The public also needs to know consequences far more great than a simple roles fine, such as the risk you take of killing yourself or others when driving while impaired. Simply knowing certain facts about driving under the influence can become entry the difference between a person driving drunk and taking a cab home. The difference between life and death lies in this choice, so it should lie in the hands of an educated person, not someone who does not know the facts about drunk driving. Another factor that can affect a persons decision to drive drunk comes with his friends.
Because the majority of dui stops happen to individuals who do not believe that they have become drunk, a person who chooses to drive does not even consider the fine that he may receive, no matter the amount. If an intoxicated person believes that he has the ability to drive home safely, a new law passed by state representatives will not stop them. A state increasing its dui fines, will not make the police notice a decline in the amount of drunken driving stops, nor a decreased amount of alcohol related accidents. The only change that would come from such an increase would come in a boost in state government funds pouring in from dui offenders. While the fight against drunk driving seems to have no end, many other solutions exist besides the raising of fines. One such solution lies in education. If the general public becomes properly educated about the meaning of intoxication, they will have the ability to make a proper choice when it comes time to decide whether or not to drive home.
Essay on Impaired Driving and Aggressive driving - eduCheer!
When you commit this offense you are refusing without reasonable excuse to give a breath sample for a roadside screening device, or refusing without reasonable excuse to accompany a police officer for the purposes of giving such a sample, when demanded by an officer. Before the officer demands a breathalyzer he must reasonably suspect that you have alcohol in your blood. The maximum penalties for impaired driving causing bodily harm to someone is up to 10 years in prison irish and up to a 10 year prohibition from driving. The maximum penalties for impaired driving causing death is up to 14 years and a 10 year prohibition from driving. The maximum penalty for manslaughter and criminal negligence causing death is up to life in prison and up to a lifetime prohibition from driving.(Purich p31). I think that these penalties for all the drinking and driving offences are very appropriate, but I think impaired driving causing death should be a lifetime imprisonment. All these offences should be taken seriously and no one should try and get around the law.
The law is here for are protection on the rode and obey them and you should be safe. When an intoxicated individual makes a decision to sit behind the wheel of an automobile and drive home, he endangers everyone on the road. This one decision, which may not seem important at the time, can have a crucial impact. When the choice whether or not to drive under the influence of alcohol faces a person, he often does not realize the consequences of his actions, and therefore makes an extremely uneducated decision. Many people believe that increasing fines for drunk driving offenders will play a significant part in the cutting down of driving under the influence. However, while stiffer dui laws will look affective on paper, they will not make a substantial step in the fight against drunk driving. The only benefit of increased drunk driving fines goes to the law enforcement agency that collects the fines.
An ampoule with a standard solution is then inserted. If the metre reads high or low by more than.02 on two successive tests, the machine should not be used. If the trial is valid, the machine should be flushed with room air and the pointer set at start. You will then be asked to provide two breath samples, about fifteen minutes apart. Normally they will take the result of the lowest result and use it as evidence against you.(Erwin p23).
«Refusing to give a breath Sample» means refusing without a reasonable excuse to give a sample or refusing without a reasonable excuse to accompany a police officer, when demanded by the police officer. Before demanding by the police officer, he must have reasonable and probable grounds to believe that you are committing or at any time in the preceding two hours have committed, one of the offences of driving or having care and control of a vehicle while. You can refuse to give a breath sample until you have communicated in private with your lawyer even if this takes you beyond the two hour period, unless it is shown that your request for a lawyer was not genuine and merely to delay the. The test can be done after the two-hour period, but a technician must testify in court as to what your blood alcohol would have been in the two-hour period. You cannot refuse to accompany the officer until you see your lawyer. You can argue that the officer didnt have reasonable and probable grounds to suspect you, but this however depends on the circumstances.(Highway traffic Law). «Refusing to submit to a roadside Screening Test» is the last offense.
Sample Essays to Activitiy 10 singh Driving School
This offence means having care and control of a vehicle whether it is in motion or not, having consumed alcohol in such a quantity that the proportion of alcohol in your blood exceeds 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milliliters of blood. The defenses are the test was administered improperly, or the breathalyzer machine was not functioning properly. To defend against breathalyzer evidence you must understand how the test should be administered. The proper procedure for a breathalyzer test is as follows. Warming up the machine until the thermometer registers 50 degrees centigrade. This should take at least 10 minutes. The machine should then be turned to zero (by using the «adjust zero control and a comparison ampoule (of normal air) inserted. If the metre remains at zero, the test can proceed.
On the breathalyzer test. Having care and control depends on all circumstances.(Purich p24). Driving While Exceeding. Is the next offence. Driving a vehicle, having consumed alcohol in such a quantity that the proportion of alcohol in your blood exceeds 80 milligrams of alcohol in 100 milliliters of blood. Some defenses are the test was administered improperly, or the breathalyzer machine was not functioning properly.(Erwin p20). «having sided Care and control of a motor Vehicle while Exceeding. G is the next offence i will talk about.
suspension of license for six months. The third offence penalty is imprisonment for three months to two years (or more) and automatic suspension of license for six months. These penalties are the same for the following offences.(Purich p22). «having Care and Control of a motor Vehicle while Impaired» is another offence. Having care and control of a vehicle does not require that you be driving. Occupying the drivers seat, even if you did not have the keys, is sufficient. Walking towards the car with the keys could be sufficient. Some defenses are you were not impaired, or you did not have care and control because you were not in the drivers seat, did not have the keys, etc. It is not a defense that you registered below.
Now lets talk about the penalties of drinking and driving. The sentence for refusing to give a breath sample is usually higher than either of the exceeding. Consequently it is usually easier in the long run for you to give a breath sample if asked. If, for example you are convicted of «Refusing to give a breath sample» for the first time, but was earlier convicted of «Driving while impaired your conviction for «Refusing» will count as a second conviction, not a first, and will receive the stiffer penalty for. For the first offence here is the penalty and the defenses you can make. Driving a vehicle while your ability to drive is impaired by alcohol or drugs is one of the offences. Evidence of your condition can be used to convict you. This can include shredder evidence of your general conduct, speech, and ability to walk a straight line or pick up objects.
Drinking and Driving Essay - 2937 Words bartleby
Driving Offences Essay, research Paper, my research paper is on «Drinking and Driving Offences». In my paper I will tell you the various kinds of drinking and driving offences, the penalties, and the defenses you can make if you are caught drinking and driving. Let me tell you about the different offences. There are six offences in drinking and driving. They are «driving while impaired «having care and control of a vehicle while impaired Driving while exceeding. «having care and control of a vehicle while exceeding. «Refusing to give a breath sample and «Refusing to submit to a roadside general screen test.» These are all Criminal Code Offences.(Erwin p17).